Collaborative Group for Research in Mathematics Education


COMPLETED RESEARCH PROJECTS


The Effectiveness of using Interactive Whiteboards in Promoting Mathematical Thinking

Project team: Sara Merrett, Julie-Ann Edwards; Keith Jones

The aim of this project was to analyse the effectiveness of using an interactive whiteboard in promoting mathematical thinking in a secondary school.

The project was part-supported by a DfES research scholarship.

A report was submitted to the DfES covering the parts of the project supported by the DfES research scholarship.

Publications

Merrett, S. and Edwards, J. (2005), Enhancing mathematical thinking with an interactive whiteboard, MicroMath, 21(3), 9-12.
Click here for full paper in pdf format.

Edwards, J., Hartnell, M. and Martin, R. (2002), Interactive Whiteboards: Some lessons from the classroom, MicroMath, 18(2), 30-33.
Click here for full paper in pdf format.

Jones, K. (2004), Using Interactive Whiteboards in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: a research bibliography, MicroMath, 20(2), 5-6.
Click here for full article in pdf format.


Bibliography

Davison, I. (2002), Using an Interactive Whiteboard to Facilitate Pupil Understanding of Quadrilateral Definitions, Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 23(1), 13-18. and
Pratt, D. & Davison, I. (2003), Interactive Whiteboards and the Construction of Definitions for the Kite, Proceedings of 27th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME 27, Hawaii, July 2003), volume 4, p31-38.
Complementary accounts illustrating that the complexities inherent in understanding definitions of quadrilaterals remain even when some of the visual and kinaesthetic affordances of the IWB are utilised.

Glover, D., & Miller, D. (2001), Running with Technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-276.
Case study of one secondary school, showing that even with a fairly limited system in use in the mathematics department, teaching can change to include more interaction, together with associated group and class discussion.

Glover, D., Miller, D. & Averis, D. (2004), Panacea or Prop: The Role of the Interactive Whiteboard in Improving Teaching Effectiveness. Paper presented at the Tenth International Congress of Mathematics Education. Copenhagen, Denmark, July 2004.
Suggests that where IWBs are used in every lesson, the novelty effect can diminish and that much depends on the overall quality of teaching.

Godwin, S. and Sutherland, R. (2004), Whole-class Technology for  Learning Mathematics: the case of functions and graphs.  Education, Communication and Information Journal (ECi), 4(1), 131-152.
Suggests that new pedagogical practices with ICT need both to harness the potential of ICT to support individual pupil inquiry
and work within this inquiry-led practice to develop collective knowledge within the whole class. While providing evidence that the use of an IWB could become an important tool in this respect, the authors provide reminders that much interactive learning can take place with an ordinary (non-digital) whiteboard.

Greiffenhagen, C. (2000). Interactive Whiteboards in Mathematics Education: Possibilities and Dangers. Paper presented at the working group on The Use of Technology in Mathematics Education held at the 9th International Congress on Mathematical Education (Tokyo, Japan, July 2000). Paper available from the author
Suggest that the IWB should not only be seen as a presentational device for the teacher, but also as an interactive and communicative device to enhance the communication with and amongst pupils.

Perks, P. (2002), The Interactive Whiteboard: implications for software design and use, Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 22(2), 55-60.
Emphasises the need to design teaching scenarios that make full use of the interactivity available with an IWB.

Steed, A. (2002), Use of an interactive whiteboard. Best Practice Research Scholarship (BPRS) report.
Suggests that there are benefits to using an IWB when teaching particular mathematical topics, most noticeable in graph work (although the author cautions that the data was collected over a relatively short time period).

A useful bibliography of research on the use of Interactive Whiteboards in mathematics education is:

Jones, K. (2004), Using Interactive Whiteboards in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics: a research bibliography, MicroMath, 20(2), 5-6.
Click here for full article in pdf format.

Other useful (but more general) publications on using Interactive Whiteboards include:

BECTa (2003), What the Research Says about Interactive Whiteboards.
Online at: http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/wtrs_whiteboards.pdf

MirandaNet (2002), Transforming Learning Using Interactive Whiteboards
Online at: http://www.mirandanet.ac.uk/ftp/whiteboard.pdf

Links

Below are links to some of the current ongoing projects, developments and networks that involve the use of IWB technology and from which further reports are likely to emerge (in alphabetic order by name of project):

InterActive Education: teaching and learning in the information age:
http://www.interactiveeducation.ac.uk/maths_designs.htm

Interactive Whiteboard Research Forum
http://www.ros.org.uk/iwb/index.htm

National Whiteboard Network
http://www.nwnet.org.uk

The REVIEW Project:
http://www.thereviewproject.org

University of Keele Interactive Whiteboard project
http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/


Page updated 08 September 2006

Back to CRME research projects

Home Back to CRME Home Page